So in preparation for my baptism into the Community of Christ church in 2 1/2 weeks, I've begun reading Dale E. Luffman's The Book of Mormon's Witness to Its First Readers, published by Community of Christ Seminary Press earlier this year. Luffman's goal in this book to contextualize the Book of Mormon by drawing attention to the spiritual, intellectual and emotional climate in which Joseph Smith Jr. lived and to which he responded in the founding of his church. It's a laudable goal, and certainly a helpful one, considering the strong emphasis on historical criticism in the way Community of Christ students are taught to interpret the scriptures.
The thing that strikes me the most, as of page 42, is that despite everything I know about the racism, sexism, and lots of other isms which many have found in the Book of Mormon, the text passionately protests against classism. This emphasis on social justice makes a whole lot of sense, considering the increasingly progressive direction in which the church is heading. Smith created a religious movement which focused on empowering the poor, the marginalized, and the uneducated. The doctrine of continuing revelation means that everyone has access to the revelatory communication of God. The priesthood of all believers means that we emphasize organic and intuitive ministry - if you are called to the priesthood, you don't need a fancy seminary degree to minister to your community (which is especially helpful if that graduate education is cost prohibitive). This makes a lot of sense to me, and I have always taken pride in the way these beliefs and practices create a worldview which feels, to me, resonant and vibrant and earthy.
But while I am grateful for the countercultural flavor of the Book of Mormon, which of course leads to the Community of Christ's mission "to proclaim Jesus Christ and promote communities of joy, hope, love, and peace", I'm worried about Luffman's assertion that the book on which my church is founded is largely anti-intellectual. Luffman explores the deism and rationalism of Smith's time, and highlights the Book of Mormon's assumed correlation between education and the sin of pride. He refers to "the book's intolerance for rationalism". (40)
"...for the wisdom of their wise and learned shall perish,
and the understanding of their prudent shall be hid."
- 2 Nephi 27:26
I have always been intellectual, and I have always been proud; and while I never claimed to read every word assigned for my classes, it's possible I picked up enough to count as "learned". My three years of seminary were spent as a member of a Unitarian Universalist church, which celebrates the kind of naturalism and rationalism against which Joseph Smith Jr. was rebelling. Now I have a Master of Divinity degree and both training and experience in professional ministry, and I am joining a church which practices lay priesthood.
This isn't really a problem, of course; I know that Community of Christ values diversity in the gifts and skills of its members. All are called to participate in the ministry of the church and in the creation of Zion. I have no doubt at all that I will be able to bring my education to bear in contributing to the church's mission in whichever way I am called.
TL;DR - My actual point is this: The Community of Christ church today is very distinct from the first generation of Mormonism established by Joseph Smith Jr. We ordain women, we're starting to ordain LGBT members, we witness through work rather than proselytism, we are non-creedal, we engage in ecumenical relationships to promote peace and social justice. But then we're not all that different in essentials; it seems to me all of these progressive practices stem from exactly the same religious egalitarianism on which Luffman reminds us the LDS church was founded. We are still Mormon. So even as the CofC church grows its seminary and invests in the professional development of our church leaders (that's what the Mission Center courses and workshops are for, yes?) - is the Community of Christ worldview still flavored by the Book of Mormon's anti-intellectualism?
If so, I have a lot more work to do to fit in.
Of course, I suspect that the next 175 pages of Luffman's book will give relief to these concerns, or at least answer my questions. But as a very rational girl joining a profoundly intuitive faith, my worry seemed to justify this very long thought process.